How does the Kremlin interpret developments in the Iranian arena, what lessons does it derive from the course of the war, and what implications do these developments hold for the Russian sphere?

Why, to date, has Beijing refrained from adopting a resolute stance in support of Tehran?

The Lebanese Army is the weak link on the path to realizing the vision of Lebanon’s new leadership, which seeks to repair and rehabilitate the state. A central aspect of implementing this vision is the collection of all weapons held by the militias, primarily Hezbollah, and their transfer to the Lebanese Army. This goal aligns with Israel’s interest in seeing Lebanon become a sovereign and functioning state, with a responsible central authority, whom Israel can address, that holds a monopoly on weapons through a strong army representing all elements loyal to the state. Hence, Israel and Lebanon share a common interest in strengthening the Lebanese Army so that it can implement government decisions while taking advantage of the growing weakness of both Hezbollah and Iran after the end of Operation Roaring Lion. The significant gap between the vision of Lebanon’s leadership, as reflected in its decisions against Hezbollah thus far, and its inability to realize that vision constitutes a challenge for Israel. This document presents the failures in the functioning of the Lebanese Army and concludes with recommendations for Israeli policy considering the current campaign, even though this document was written during the war and there is no certainty as to how it will end. Its importance also stems from the need to prepare for the international conference in Paris, which will focus on strengthening the Lebanese Army and whose date has been postponed until early April.  

Trump's decision point on whether to continue the war in Iran — and the implications for Israel

Missiles, refugees, Kurds, and eroding regional standing: The challenges Ankara faces during the war in Iran, its actions, and the opportunities it may seek to exploit